<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for passionforarts.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://passionforarts.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://passionforarts.com</link>
	<description>爱艺术</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 웰컴 투 동막골Welcome to Dongmakgol欢迎到东莫村&#8212;&#8212;理想主义寓言故事 by cheewee</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=620&#038;cpage=1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>cheewee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=620#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Actually i know this movie because of joe hisaishi&#039;s music. I was curious where does this beautiful music fits xD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually i know this movie because of joe hisaishi&#8217;s music. I was curious where does this beautiful music fits xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adaptation《改编剧本》&#8212;&#8212;一个玩笑而已 by Synecdoche, New York《纽约提喻法/纽约浮世绘》&#8212;&#8212;用一生去创作一部“死” &#171; passionforarts.com</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=453&#038;cpage=1#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Synecdoche, New York《纽约提喻法/纽约浮世绘》&#8212;&#8212;用一生去创作一部“死” &#171; passionforarts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=453#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] 这位作家，不但是个爱玩形式的作家，而且在这方面显得很有天分。他的每一部作品，包括《改编剧本》，都尽量地在形式上创新。这部他自己导演的作品，《纽约浮世绘》在形式上更让人感到惊叹不已。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 这位作家，不但是个爱玩形式的作家，而且在这方面显得很有天分。他的每一部作品，包括《改编剧本》，都尽量地在形式上创新。这部他自己导演的作品，《纽约浮世绘》在形式上更让人感到惊叹不已。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《叶问》&#8212;&#8212;空虚的爱国英雄 by 《精武英雄》&#8212;&#8212;实在的武术英雄 &#171; passionforarts.com</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=241&#038;cpage=1#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>《精武英雄》&#8212;&#8212;实在的武术英雄 &#171; passionforarts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=241#comment-135</guid>
		<description>[...] 在《叶问》和《叶问2》受到极大反响的时候重看这部在1994年拍的《精武英雄》是很有意思的。为什么？因为14年和16年后，两部《叶问》竟然抛弃当年《精武英雄》在思想上达到的高度，而倒退到自我封闭的狭隘胸襟和因自卑而造成的自大，自我陶醉当中去。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 在《叶问》和《叶问2》受到极大反响的时候重看这部在1994年拍的《精武英雄》是很有意思的。为什么？因为14年和16年后，两部《叶问》竟然抛弃当年《精武英雄》在思想上达到的高度，而倒退到自我封闭的狭隘胸襟和因自卑而造成的自大，自我陶醉当中去。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;一个邪教的诞生 by 《我是无神论者》 &#171; passionforarts.com</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=539&#038;cpage=1#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>《我是无神论者》 &#171; passionforarts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=539#comment-134</guid>
		<description>[...] passionforarts.com 爱艺术      &#171; 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;-一个邪教的诞生 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] passionforarts.com 爱艺术      &laquo; 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;-一个邪教的诞生 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;一个邪教的诞生 by Wan Kong Yew</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=539&#038;cpage=1#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Wan Kong Yew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=539#comment-133</guid>
		<description>By the way, I regularly read articles on scientific research related to the brain and often write about them on my blog. If you&#039;re interested, here are some links:

Michael Persinger is a brain researcher who has had some success in artificially inducing a feeling that some interpret as religiosity by directing a strong magnetic field into a specific part of the brain. It doesn&#039;t work consistently but appears to be linked to the subject&#039;s suggestibility. This is reinforced by the fact that the subjects&#039; religious visions can be somewhat manipulated by changing the decor, so if you put a subject in a room decorated with Eastern decor, he would be more likely to experience visions of Eastern deities for example.

Relevant link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/godonbrain.shtml

Similar to the video link you posted, recent research also suggests that subjects who have incurred damage to specific parts of their brains are prone to feeling transcendence. Surgically removing specific parts of the brain works as well.

Relevant link:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=brain-surgery-boosts-spiritual</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I regularly read articles on scientific research related to the brain and often write about them on my blog. If you&#8217;re interested, here are some links:</p>
<p>Michael Persinger is a brain researcher who has had some success in artificially inducing a feeling that some interpret as religiosity by directing a strong magnetic field into a specific part of the brain. It doesn&#8217;t work consistently but appears to be linked to the subject&#8217;s suggestibility. This is reinforced by the fact that the subjects&#8217; religious visions can be somewhat manipulated by changing the decor, so if you put a subject in a room decorated with Eastern decor, he would be more likely to experience visions of Eastern deities for example.</p>
<p>Relevant link:<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/godonbrain.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2003/godonbrain.shtml</a></p>
<p>Similar to the video link you posted, recent research also suggests that subjects who have incurred damage to specific parts of their brains are prone to feeling transcendence. Surgically removing specific parts of the brain works as well.</p>
<p>Relevant link:<br />
<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=brain-surgery-boosts-spiritual" rel="nofollow">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=brain-surgery-boosts-spiritual</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;一个邪教的诞生 by Wan Kong Yew</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=539&#038;cpage=1#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Wan Kong Yew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=539#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Choo, that video link is indeed interesting but I have to draw a different conclusion from it that what you&#039;ve seemingly reached. You seem to think that this demonstrates the reality of what is sometimes known as the transcendence effect and that this is something that we should strive for.
In my case, I certainly agree that the transcendence effect exists but this demonstration only proves that the effect is simply a product of the brain&#039;s biochemistry and that there are no supernatural causes for it. If you enjoy that feeling then, by all means, you should try to reach that state of mind, even if you have to induce it artificially. But I do not agree that just because this effect exists that we have to reach it. After all, being drunk is another brain state. What if someone enjoys the state of inebriation? Similarly, I enjoy playing games and the brain state I strive for can be summed up as &quot;enjoyable frustration&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choo, that video link is indeed interesting but I have to draw a different conclusion from it that what you&#8217;ve seemingly reached. You seem to think that this demonstrates the reality of what is sometimes known as the transcendence effect and that this is something that we should strive for.<br />
In my case, I certainly agree that the transcendence effect exists but this demonstration only proves that the effect is simply a product of the brain&#8217;s biochemistry and that there are no supernatural causes for it. If you enjoy that feeling then, by all means, you should try to reach that state of mind, even if you have to induce it artificially. But I do not agree that just because this effect exists that we have to reach it. After all, being drunk is another brain state. What if someone enjoys the state of inebriation? Similarly, I enjoy playing games and the brain state I strive for can be summed up as &#8220;enjoyable frustration&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;一个邪教的诞生 by Choo</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=539&#038;cpage=1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Choo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=539#comment-131</guid>
		<description>“所有的人是一家的”这种想法并不归属于宗教 &lt;--- ya, i totally agree on that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“所有的人是一家的”这种想法并不归属于宗教 &lt;&#8212; ya, i totally agree on that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;一个邪教的诞生 by taisiawshan</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=539&#038;cpage=1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>taisiawshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=539#comment-130</guid>
		<description>那，我还是跟你讲，“所有的人是一家的”这种想法并不归属于宗教。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>那，我还是跟你讲，“所有的人是一家的”这种想法并不归属于宗教。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;一个邪教的诞生 by Choo</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=539&#038;cpage=1#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Choo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=539#comment-129</guid>
		<description>sorry i need to explain what i said earlier:
the youtubelink i posted, she saying  we are brothers and sisters, that part sounds abit religion.
but i don&#039;t think she is trying to make a religion of of this because earlier you were saying &quot;为什么要将这种体验归纳为宗教呢？&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry i need to explain what i said earlier:<br />
the youtubelink i posted, she saying  we are brothers and sisters, that part sounds abit religion.<br />
but i don&#8217;t think she is trying to make a religion of of this because earlier you were saying &#8220;为什么要将这种体验归纳为宗教呢？&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 《即可开悟之匙（一）》&#8212;&#8212;一个邪教的诞生 by taisiawshan</title>
		<link>http://passionforarts.com/?p=539&#038;cpage=1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>taisiawshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforarts.com/?p=539#comment-128</guid>
		<description>那你错了。爱不是只是在宗教里找到的。我的爱和理想是通过艺术得到的。我的老公的爱和理想是通过科学得到的。一个非常反对宗教的无神论者，可以是对人生和世界充满激情和关怀的。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>那你错了。爱不是只是在宗教里找到的。我的爱和理想是通过艺术得到的。我的老公的爱和理想是通过科学得到的。一个非常反对宗教的无神论者，可以是对人生和世界充满激情和关怀的。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
